Page 1 of 1
SH/O BiPods…
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:46 pm
by Toe Cutter
Bipod Width in SH and SHO?
They seem to be getting wider and wider…
The NRAA pages won’t open up at the moment - well, not for me anyways…
Does anyone have a copy saved and can give us a heads up?
TY in advance…
Maybe I should take a ruler to the VRA Kings?
Re: SH/O BiPods…
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:12 pm
by PeteFox
23.1.10 Front Rests – The front of the rifle may be supported by a sporting type folding bipod (e.g. Harris, Atlas or similar)
23.1.11.1 Bipod legs in an unextended position must not exceed 36 cm (14 inches) footprint centre to centre of the point of contact with the ground.
23.1.11.2 The bipod must be resting directly on the ground with no mat or plate under the bipod.
23.1.11.3 The bipod must not be fitted with spikes or skis.
23.1.11.4 The bipod must not be connected to the shooting mat.
Re: SH/O BiPods…
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2025 5:33 am
by Toe Cutter
PeteFox wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:12 pm
23.1.10 Front Rests – The front of the rifle may be supported by a sporting type folding bipod (e.g. Harris, Atlas or similar)
23.1.11.1 Bipod legs in an
unextended position must not exceed 36 cm (14 inches) footprint centre to centre of the point of contact with the ground.
23.1.11.2 The bipod must be resting directly on the ground with no mat or plate under the bipod.
23.1.11.3 The bipod must not be fitted with spikes or skis.
23.1.11.4 The bipod must not be connected to the shooting mat.
Awesome! - thanks Foxy
Re: SH/O BiPods…
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2025 8:43 pm
by Tim L
I'm seeing a few mloc folding legs that attach to the stock rather than a bipod assembly. Are they likely to come under scrutiny?
Screenshot_20250227_204147_Samsung Internet.jpg
Re: SH/O BiPods…
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2025 9:14 pm
by Lithgow
I see no issue personally, the rules do not state 1 piece bipod so as long as they fold 'like a harris' and maintain the maximum distance unextended, go for it, I know a few using that style.
