Loading Startpoint Suggestions for 308

Get or give advice on equipment, reloading and other technical issues.

Moderator: Mod

Walt
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:25 am
Location: Shoalhaven
Been thanked: 19 times

Loading Startpoint Suggestions for 308

Post by Walt »

Recommendations invited for a ladder testing start point load for .308. with Berger 168 proj driven by ADI 2208.
Daveh
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2020 9:40 pm
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 87 times

Re: Loading Startpoint Suggestions for 308

Post by Daveh »

Walt
What action and barrel length are you using.

Dave
Walt
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:25 am
Location: Shoalhaven
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Loading Startpoint Suggestions for 308

Post by Walt »

Hi Dave, and thanks for responding. Its a L/H Omark with a 28" barrel.
Barossa_222
Posts: 417
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 6:58 pm
Location: Barossa Valley
Has thanked: 188 times
Been thanked: 176 times

Re: Loading Startpoint Suggestions for 308

Post by Barossa_222 »

Go to the ADI reloading page. Find the bullet weight and powder type. Look for the maximum charge weight. Start 1.5-2 grains under and increase in .2gr increments.
Daveh
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2020 9:40 pm
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 87 times

Re: Loading Startpoint Suggestions for 308

Post by Daveh »

Walt
I would start at 42.5 and work up to 44 stepping .3 at a time to see if you can find a sweet spot. I prefer using an accurate node down from one that is close to max load. Watch for pressure craters in the primers if you go over 44gn.
I have one rifle shooting 168g Sierra with 41.5 of 2206H. Excellent up to 800 yds.
As mentioned above check the ADI site. ADI data indicates 45.5 is max load of 2208 with a 168gn Sierra projectile.

I have found the 168g seem to work well around 2700-2720 fps.

If you haven't got a lot of 2208 yet I would try and see if you can get a good shooting load with 2206H. In recon it is a cleaner powder as far as barrel cleaning.

Are you setting it up for FTR.
Dave
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic