Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Get or give advice on equipment, reloading and other technical issues.

Moderator: Mod

BATattack
Posts: 1343
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:29 pm
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 280 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by BATattack »

Tim N wrote:It may have been like that from the factory


Like Tim said. Sharp folds that look like splits are usually from factory. Excess lube usually just leave a dent that will blow out during firing.
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by macguru »

i sent a box back for replacement but i am looking at alternatives. Overall I like the calibre but its certainly not suitable for someone starting out. Thats creedmore territory... or 308.
id quod est
PeteFox
Posts: 795
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:20 pm
Location: 7321 Tas.
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 546 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by PeteFox »

The internet is a stupidity distribution system designed to replace facts with opinions, so that idiots don't have to think.
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by macguru »

a little overpriced ? I am going to buy some hornady loads and shoot them :)
Last edited by macguru on Sun Feb 05, 2023 6:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
id quod est
Lithgow
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 8:07 pm
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by Lithgow »

247 cases! 150 of which are brand new ADG which is a 12 month wait if your lucky enough to make the waiting list....
As a per case rate, still only works out to $2.22 ea.
Lapua is $3.10Ea and at least 18 months away.
It's a great price imo
Steve G
Nowra Rifle Club NSW
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by macguru »

i think i misread the ad cheers. is ADG brass any good ? Is bertram brass any good ?
id quod est
Lithgow
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 8:07 pm
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by Lithgow »

I use Lapua and now also Bertram.
Bertram is an unknown to me at the moment, currently fireforming but will test at full charge next week
ADG is highly sought after, excellent quality and has great longevity ( as good as Lap )
Steve G
Nowra Rifle Club NSW
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by macguru »

I got a full refund on 50/150 nosler cases that I bought from one supplier. I sent them a photo of the case crack after 2 firings and they offered a refund so I accepted. (the other 100 were from somewhere else and ill have to keep them)
id quod est
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by macguru »

I also have 97 bertram (used) cases that I just purchased at a very good price. I am fairly confident that with my body die and competition shellholder set I will be able to prep them OK. I am just using the normal shellholder at the moment with the my 100 nosler cases and its fine, no chambering problems.
More generally, I would say the 6.5prc is great, but its a bit over the top as your only rifle. For mids Fopen, or as a second SH gun, its great. But for everyday with the latter I would get a creedmore or a 308. Its cheaper to run.
id quod est
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by macguru »

I can get some bertram brass from the maker .... is it good ? remember its for SH not open :)
id quod est
Lithgow
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 8:07 pm
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by Lithgow »

Aside from oldschool brass prep, they are great!
2nd firing of it has proven successful, both high and low charge.
The case head seems very hard so won't show pressure as easily so bolt lift and primer inspection will be very important.
Steve G
Nowra Rifle Club NSW
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by macguru »

yeah the rcbs dies were def. hard on the necks... the new 3 die setup (Forster bush die, redding body die, forster mic seating die) I have is not causing any problems with the nosler brass. But I have some Bertram cases coming as well.
id quod est
DaveB
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:50 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by DaveB »

download/file.php?mode=view&id=7532
Missed a zero 6.9" at 1000yds....
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by DaveB on Fri Feb 17, 2023 10:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by macguru »

Yeah, I had 100 new cases arrive yesterday. I found the bertram guy on facebook but i bought them from rebel. I had to run it through the neck bushing to fit my tikka, because the neck was catching in the throat, because its thicker than the nosler by a couple of thou, so it should last :) looks like no other problems... should be fine
id quod est
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic