Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Get or give advice on equipment, reloading and other technical issues.

Moderator: Mod

Shobby
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:26 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by Shobby »

Send me a PM not discussing on Forum.
willow
Posts: 599
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2015 9:51 pm
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 221 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by willow »

macguru wrote:Can I have some advice about starting loads with 6.5prc, 2213 and sierra 140s please ?
I was thinking 53gr and work up to 55gr but am I being conservative ?


Talk to Alpy mate, he's working one up right now. I'd be looking at 2217 in the 6.5 variant though.
heritage5
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 1:19 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 20 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by heritage5 »

My load for the 156 eol bergers is between 55 and 57 gr of 2217 i found that hornady 140 147 and 153 all were blowing up at speeds of above 2980 fps.
Hope that is of some use.

Guy
heritage5
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 1:19 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 20 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by heritage5 »

Sorry forgot the barrel is 1in8
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by macguru »

I have my 6.5 prc now so I am going to give it a go ... I just wish I had found some lapua brass, the nosler stuff looks lovely but I dont know how tough it will prove to be ....
id quod est
PeteFox
Posts: 795
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:20 pm
Location: 7321 Tas.
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 546 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by PeteFox »

Nosler brass is made by Norma
Pete
The internet is a stupidity distribution system designed to replace facts with opinions, so that idiots don't have to think.
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by macguru »

Yes, I know, thats why I am concerned
id quod est
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by macguru »

I can make a few observations from my testing of the tikka UPR 6.5PRC
1. The rifle is very light for a cartridge burning 50+ grains of powder. You would need a muzzle brake for PRS, the creedmore might be a better bet. (I am going to run 2 configurations, a factory stock and an MDT stock to bring the weight up where permissable)
2. It gets HOT , I am going to try 2217 as advised by willow or cut my 2213 load. I have not chronoed it yet but its quick enough.. (3000 is my guess, will find out soon)
3. The brass is holding up better than I expected, but if I ever try another calibre I am going to hoard the lapua brass first like rolls of toilet paper during covid.
4. The tikka trigger was too heavy (2kg) but its easy to adjust and i have fixed that.
5. My next barrel(s) will be 26" rem varmint profile 7.5 twist to try heavy pills, when I can find some :)
id quod est
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by macguru »

Screen Shot 2023-02-01 at 5.55.42 pm.png
This is NOT from an overloaded case, 2 firings. I also have a couple of neck cracks .... nosler brass. I have sent a box back for refund or replacement at the seller's suggestion..... but I was wondering, would AMP annealing the necks BEFORE firing help ? obviously its not lapua :)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
id quod est
heritage5
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 1:19 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 20 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by heritage5 »

Is your sizing Die clean and not binding it looks like a Die problem.
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by macguru »

good point , although i am not sure what 'binding' means. do you mean i'm pulling the neck up ? Its clean but its an rcbs all in one die,
i have another type of die coming and i'm holding off on using this resizing die on the next batch
but i think the necks are kind of brittle
id quod est
PeteFox
Posts: 795
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:20 pm
Location: 7321 Tas.
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 546 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by PeteFox »

What die lube are you using?
Pete
The internet is a stupidity distribution system designed to replace facts with opinions, so that idiots don't have to think.
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by macguru »

imperial, but very sparingly. when i get my redding body die ill stop using the rcbs all in one and do some careful measuring, and i have a forster neck die thats easier on the necks
id quod est
Tim N
Posts: 1341
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:18 pm
Location: Branxton NSW
Has thanked: 102 times
Been thanked: 511 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by Tim N »

It may have been like that from the factory
We don't rise to the level of our expectations, we fall to the level of our training. Archilochos 680-645 BC
PeteFox
Posts: 795
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:20 pm
Location: 7321 Tas.
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 546 times

Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

Post by PeteFox »

macguru wrote:Yes, I know, thats why I am concerned


I don't understand the issue with Norma brass. I've found it to be excellent

It's difficult to tell from the photo but that looks like the brass has folded inwards from an accumulation of lube, or is it a split. I would expect the neck to split first
Pete
The internet is a stupidity distribution system designed to replace facts with opinions, so that idiots don't have to think.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic