Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?
Moderator: Mod
Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?
macguru wrote:Can I have some advice about starting loads with 6.5prc, 2213 and sierra 140s please ?
I was thinking 53gr and work up to 55gr but am I being conservative ?
Talk to Alpy mate, he's working one up right now. I'd be looking at 2217 in the 6.5 variant though.
Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?
My load for the 156 eol bergers is between 55 and 57 gr of 2217 i found that hornady 140 147 and 153 all were blowing up at speeds of above 2980 fps.
Hope that is of some use.
Guy
Hope that is of some use.
Guy
Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?
I have my 6.5 prc now so I am going to give it a go ... I just wish I had found some lapua brass, the nosler stuff looks lovely but I dont know how tough it will prove to be ....
id quod est
-
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:20 pm
- Location: 7321 Tas.
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?
Nosler brass is made by Norma
Pete
Pete
The internet is a stupidity distribution system designed to replace facts with opinions, so that idiots don't have to think.
Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?
I can make a few observations from my testing of the tikka UPR 6.5PRC
1. The rifle is very light for a cartridge burning 50+ grains of powder. You would need a muzzle brake for PRS, the creedmore might be a better bet. (I am going to run 2 configurations, a factory stock and an MDT stock to bring the weight up where permissable)
2. It gets HOT , I am going to try 2217 as advised by willow or cut my 2213 load. I have not chronoed it yet but its quick enough.. (3000 is my guess, will find out soon)
3. The brass is holding up better than I expected, but if I ever try another calibre I am going to hoard the lapua brass first like rolls of toilet paper during covid.
4. The tikka trigger was too heavy (2kg) but its easy to adjust and i have fixed that.
5. My next barrel(s) will be 26" rem varmint profile 7.5 twist to try heavy pills, when I can find some
1. The rifle is very light for a cartridge burning 50+ grains of powder. You would need a muzzle brake for PRS, the creedmore might be a better bet. (I am going to run 2 configurations, a factory stock and an MDT stock to bring the weight up where permissable)
2. It gets HOT , I am going to try 2217 as advised by willow or cut my 2213 load. I have not chronoed it yet but its quick enough.. (3000 is my guess, will find out soon)
3. The brass is holding up better than I expected, but if I ever try another calibre I am going to hoard the lapua brass first like rolls of toilet paper during covid.
4. The tikka trigger was too heavy (2kg) but its easy to adjust and i have fixed that.
5. My next barrel(s) will be 26" rem varmint profile 7.5 twist to try heavy pills, when I can find some

id quod est
Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
id quod est
Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?
Is your sizing Die clean and not binding it looks like a Die problem.
Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?
good point , although i am not sure what 'binding' means. do you mean i'm pulling the neck up ? Its clean but its an rcbs all in one die,
i have another type of die coming and i'm holding off on using this resizing die on the next batch
but i think the necks are kind of brittle
i have another type of die coming and i'm holding off on using this resizing die on the next batch
but i think the necks are kind of brittle
id quod est
-
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:20 pm
- Location: 7321 Tas.
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?
What die lube are you using?
Pete
Pete
The internet is a stupidity distribution system designed to replace facts with opinions, so that idiots don't have to think.
Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?
imperial, but very sparingly. when i get my redding body die ill stop using the rcbs all in one and do some careful measuring, and i have a forster neck die thats easier on the necks
id quod est
-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:18 pm
- Location: Branxton NSW
- Has thanked: 102 times
- Been thanked: 511 times
Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?
It may have been like that from the factory
We don't rise to the level of our expectations, we fall to the level of our training. Archilochos 680-645 BC
-
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:20 pm
- Location: 7321 Tas.
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Why not 6.5 PRC for 'midrange' F-class?
macguru wrote:Yes, I know, thats why I am concerned
I don't understand the issue with Norma brass. I've found it to be excellent
It's difficult to tell from the photo but that looks like the brass has folded inwards from an accumulation of lube, or is it a split. I would expect the neck to split first
Pete
The internet is a stupidity distribution system designed to replace facts with opinions, so that idiots don't have to think.