sara queens
Moderator: Mod
-
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 4:31 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 40 times
What's the state of the range at present? I've just had another competition down the road a little at Virginia postponed because the range is under water. I recall some pics posted on this forum earlier in the year with boats floating around Lower Light - do I need to bring my tinny after all?
Barry
Barry
-
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:07 pm
- Has thanked: 413 times
- Been thanked: 330 times
barry,
the range is looking the best it ever has.
we can't do anything about the horrendous conditions you have to shoot in weatherwise.
the range is dry as we speak.
see ya when we're lookin atcha.
bruce.
the range is looking the best it ever has.
we can't do anything about the horrendous conditions you have to shoot in weatherwise.
the range is dry as we speak.
see ya when we're lookin atcha.
bruce.
"SUCH IS LIFE" Edward Kelly 11 nov 1880
http://youtu.be/YRaRCCZjdTM
http://youtu.be/YRaRCCZjdTM
-
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 7:57 pm
- Location: Western Australia
-
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 4:31 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 40 times
bruce moulds wrote:we can't do anything about the horrendous conditions you have to shoot in weatherwise.
I don't care what I shoot in Bruce - I'm quite resigned to getting down and taking my hiding from the elements along with everyone else.
What I DO tire of is having to pull my caravan annexe down to prevent it getting blown to shreds!!

Barry
Hello Bruce,
Can you please confirm what you stated below, (copy and paste from Sept 15 NSW Queens thread) about blow-offs for the SARA Queens. Sounds good to me but from memory I thought it was until 7.30am.
Anyway I phoned Paul Gale today to check on this and he did not know of any such agreement and stated the Range Officer, (Jim Bowles) would need to be contacted to arrange this. Have you got this info from Jim or can you please let us know what the arrangement is for blow-offs prior to the days shooting.
Ian
bruce moulds
Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 1673
PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:52 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
alan,
returning to blowoffs.
if fclass is allowed blowoffs on the mound prior to or during strings,
I am concerned that unless tr embraced this as well, we might return to the old days of tr/fclass range wars, from club level to the top.
also, the rules went from 3 to 2 sighters, and this seems to have stood the sport in a good position.
it just comes down to barrel management, a challenge, but a thing that can be done.
ultimately, if we need blowoffs, I feel that the range should be made available prior to the day's shooting for blowoffs into the mound with no targets, in order that no shooter has an advantage with understanding the weather.
obviously if you don't need to blowoff, then you should not be forced to do so to have an equal chance.
the policy at sara queens now is that the range is available until 7.00 am for this purpose, and this should suffice for fouling a barrel, if that is your only motive.
keep safe,
bruce.
Can you please confirm what you stated below, (copy and paste from Sept 15 NSW Queens thread) about blow-offs for the SARA Queens. Sounds good to me but from memory I thought it was until 7.30am.
Anyway I phoned Paul Gale today to check on this and he did not know of any such agreement and stated the Range Officer, (Jim Bowles) would need to be contacted to arrange this. Have you got this info from Jim or can you please let us know what the arrangement is for blow-offs prior to the days shooting.
Ian
bruce moulds
Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 1673
PostPosted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:52 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
alan,
returning to blowoffs.
if fclass is allowed blowoffs on the mound prior to or during strings,
I am concerned that unless tr embraced this as well, we might return to the old days of tr/fclass range wars, from club level to the top.
also, the rules went from 3 to 2 sighters, and this seems to have stood the sport in a good position.
it just comes down to barrel management, a challenge, but a thing that can be done.
ultimately, if we need blowoffs, I feel that the range should be made available prior to the day's shooting for blowoffs into the mound with no targets, in order that no shooter has an advantage with understanding the weather.
obviously if you don't need to blowoff, then you should not be forced to do so to have an equal chance.
the policy at sara queens now is that the range is available until 7.00 am for this purpose, and this should suffice for fouling a barrel, if that is your only motive.
keep safe,
bruce.
__________________________________________
A small ES is good. A small SD is better. A small group is best!
A small ES is good. A small SD is better. A small group is best!
-
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:07 pm
- Has thanked: 413 times
- Been thanked: 330 times
sounds like we will have to wait to see what jim says.
I know he does not want people blasting shots into the side of the road off range.
keep safe,
bruce.
I know he does not want people blasting shots into the side of the road off range.
keep safe,
bruce.
"SUCH IS LIFE" Edward Kelly 11 nov 1880
http://youtu.be/YRaRCCZjdTM
http://youtu.be/YRaRCCZjdTM
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:05 am
- Location: South Oz.
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
IanP wrote:Hello Bruce,
Can you please confirm what you stated below, (copy and paste from Sept 15 NSW Queens thread) about blow-offs for the SARA Queens. Sounds good to me but from memory I thought it was until 7.30am.
[/i]
Wouldn't this put those who stay or live close to the range at an advantage?
I know a few who will be competing who will drive out each day and who's travel time is over 1 hour.
Unless they have a designated "blow off" prior to the shoot at a time where it is fair and reasonable to all competitors then it should not be allowed.
I am in favor of a "blow off" period but a more realistic time frame of between 8am -8-30am would seem a fair option.
Last edited by Hangfire on Sat Sep 28, 2013 7:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 7532
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:22 pm
- Location: Maffra, Vic
- Has thanked: 229 times
- Been thanked: 936 times
Until blow-off shots are actually incorporated into the first range of the day, then there will always be potential for unfairness. Some can do blow-offs before leaving home, or en route to the range (a hazardous practice). Better to make it available to all as it was at the FCWC, where it worked well. I would like to see the SSRs amended to allow this.
Alan
Alan
-
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 131 times
- Been thanked: 232 times
-
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 131 times
- Been thanked: 232 times
I am not against Blow off shots in principle as I am fully aware of the problems associated with clean barrels, particularly at long ranges.
Blow off shots are solely to foul the clean barrel to make those sighters meaningful-- correct?
As per last post - what about those who clean between ranges?
What about those using molly who claim true first shots --do they NEED blow off shots?
If they do not then maybe that's unfair.
Why is doing blow off shots on the way to the range considered unfair?
Not condoning it --just asking.
Some rifles go straight in when clean and stay there -- is that unfair?
I rather think that the pursuit of an extra sighter would be a better way to go.
The argument for an extra sighter is valid when one considers FC shoot at a "bull " half the size of that for TR.
Food for thought.
Blow off shots are solely to foul the clean barrel to make those sighters meaningful-- correct?
As per last post - what about those who clean between ranges?
What about those using molly who claim true first shots --do they NEED blow off shots?
If they do not then maybe that's unfair.
Why is doing blow off shots on the way to the range considered unfair?
Not condoning it --just asking.
Some rifles go straight in when clean and stay there -- is that unfair?
I rather think that the pursuit of an extra sighter would be a better way to go.
The argument for an extra sighter is valid when one considers FC shoot at a "bull " half the size of that for TR.
Food for thought.
-
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 131 times
- Been thanked: 232 times
-
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 131 times
- Been thanked: 232 times
-
- Posts: 1979
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:37 pm
- Location: Adelaide South Australia (CTV)
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
I train to deal with clean bore shots
IMO those that don't put then selve at a disadvantage when they go to a range or OPM where blow off shots prior to the event is disallowed or facilities not available.
PPP = PPP
Team Shooting is a different matter
IMO those that don't put then selve at a disadvantage when they go to a range or OPM where blow off shots prior to the event is disallowed or facilities not available.
PPP = PPP
Team Shooting is a different matter
Last edited by RAVEN on Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.