Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 6:46 pm
by M12LRPV
IanP wrote:I look forward to reading your next book on ballistics and in particular to the peer reviews by your fellow ballisticians. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Ian


That's really funny. I said I wrote software but you think I should write a book. Why on earth would you possibly suggest writing a book on ballistics given that as a book subject it's already been well done to death? There is so much research on ballistics it's not funny. What did you think? That there was just one book out there and that this is some new groundbreaking subject?

Or perhaps you were just trying to make a point like your previous one.

IanP wrote:... the world is following his lead using G7 BCs ...


Besides you still haven't answered the question I asked.

How does the use of a G7 BC against a set of G7 data tables compare to Sierra's velocity based multiple G1 BC's against a set G1 data tables???


I look forward to YOUR answer to my question :-"

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:43 pm
by Matt P
deleted

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:02 pm
by taka
OK I tried out in rifle on friday and saturday, kept brass as it comes.
Using cci 450's HBC 155grn and 46.2 grn ar2208, shot very nicely and very consistant elevation, no pressure issues and very happy.

So now I will keep using this brass and do load dev to refine load and chrony for nodes and jump/jam etc for group.

Thank you for all responses. much info available from shooters.

Steve