SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Introduced in 2019, this class is defined in Chapter 23 of the SSRs. It offers shooters with factory sporting rifles the opportunity of participating at NRAA ranges alongside TR and F-Class.
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by macguru »

we could just rename it "sporter class" really all this emphasis on hunting is a bit over the top when we are shooting at such long ranges we need decent scopes and calibres
id quod est
bolster55
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:46 pm
Location: NE Vic
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 16 times
Contact:

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by bolster55 »

Just imagine a new shooter wanting to shoot at 1000 yards using factory ammo loaded for shooting foxes!
And using a 3- 9 power scope
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by macguru »

Exactly, I mean we are shooting alongside F class, at F class ranges and targets, so you need to be able to aim the thing at 1000 yards and use a decent calibre rifle otherwise you are wasting everybody's time. The scorer, the other shooters and your own.
id quod est
bolster55
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:46 pm
Location: NE Vic
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 16 times
Contact:

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by bolster55 »

We'll just have to hope that sanity prevails
Weairy
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 1:43 pm
Location: Seymour, Vic
Has thanked: 74 times
Been thanked: 210 times

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by Weairy »

It’s still a case of do you want;
A) “Simulated Hunting” class; use the gear you’d use out bush on the range
Or
B) F-Class style shooting with less suitable rifles and equipment than normal.

That really decides the direction the class should/could take. Let’s be fair, not a lot of traditional hunting rifles and scopes are suited to 1000yd shooting. If I took the deer rifle we’ve got in the cupboard to the range (original 8mm Mauser with a 3-9x Tasco), I’d be told to go home after two shots on an electronic target…
Josh Weaire
dazza284
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 12:12 am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by dazza284 »

bolster55 wrote:Just imagine a new shooter wanting to shoot at 1000 yards using factory ammo loaded for shooting foxes!
And using a 3- 9 power scope

This is what it should be and they should put in a100 and 200 yd mound using the equipment you describe shoot between 100 200 300 400 500 and 600 yd that would really cover hunter class as far as I am concerned basic sport weight rifles no heavy barrels and up to 16x scope.
It is after all hunter class not varmint class .
JMHO
lonerider43
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 6:55 pm
Has thanked: 149 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by lonerider43 »

dazza284 wrote:
bolster55 wrote:Just imagine a new shooter wanting to shoot at 1000 yards using factory ammo loaded for shooting foxes!
And using a 3- 9 power scope

This is what it should be and they should put in a100 and 200 yd mound using the equipment you describe shoot between 100 200 300 400 500 and 600 yd that would really cover hunter class as far as I am concerned basic sport weight rifles no heavy barrels and up to 16x scope.
It is after all hunter class not varmint class .
JMHO

i agree with ya mostly,but....
those clubs [like mine] that dont have a 1,2 and 400 yrd mound arent going to justify the cost and hassle of building mounds just to appease the 4 or5 hunting rifles that MIGHT turn up to shoot 5 or 6 times a year. [even with et's]
if hunters were really that interested in competing they could easily get a single shot rifle at not an enormous price and have a go.
omark,musgrave and winchester to name a couple.there are many that could be used.
Australian's Against "Gun-A-Phobia"
dazza284
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 12:12 am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by dazza284 »

lonerider43 wrote:
dazza284 wrote:
bolster55 wrote:Just imagine a new shooter wanting to shoot at 1000 yards using factory ammo loaded for shooting foxes!
And using a 3- 9 power scope

This is what it should be and they should put in a100 and 200 yd mound using the equipment you describe shoot between 100 200 300 400 500 and 600 yd that would really cover hunter class as far as I am concerned basic sport weight rifles no heavy barrels and up to 16x scope.
It is after all hunter class not varmint class .
JMHO

i agree with ya mostly,but....
those clubs [like mine] that dont have a 1,2 and 400 yrd mound arent going to justify the cost and hassle of building mounds just to appease the 4 or5 hunting rifles that MIGHT turn up to shoot 5 or 6 times a year. [even with et's]
if hunters were really that interested in competing they could easily get a single shot rifle at not an enormous price and have a go.
omark,musgrave and winchester to name a couple.there are many that could be used.

I don't know too many hunters that would spend $2000 just to try something the point to my remarks is that the 2 clubs I have been to the closest mound is 300 yd 2 most hunters150 yd is a long shot .
how does somebody go in and shoot if 300y Intimidateds them which would be probably 80% of hunters if you are trying to attract people to the sport you must make it easy for them or they just won't come back.
I have never been to a sight in day or come and try so am just wondering how this is done with 300y being the minimum .
Weairy
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 1:43 pm
Location: Seymour, Vic
Has thanked: 74 times
Been thanked: 210 times

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by Weairy »

dazza284 wrote:I have never been to a sight in day or come and try so am just wondering how this is done with 300y being the minimum .


We held a come and try day, had 67 shooters turn up. About 20-25 brought their own gear, all hunters. Our only rules were you had to know your basic zero range, whatever it was, and keep within the range template (under 8mm, under 3500ftlb).

All set up at 300yd. We pinned a piece of 32mm ply to the mound, painted it bright pink to give them a spotter and had a bloke with them that knew how to spot and adjust accordingly. Most got on target within a few shots. They then had the option to shoot the ET if they wanted to. They were all chewing at the bit to try their hand at 300yd shooting, everything from 223s and 22-250s, to 30-06s and 300 Win Mags.

We supplied three rifles, factory barrelled Rem700 223 and 308 set up for Sporting Hunter and a “typical” rifle you’d see ($700 vortex scope, basic adjustable stock on one, chassis and Nightforce in the other because it’s my Precision Service Rifle) and one TR for those wanting to try peeps. Big bags of factory ammo at $2 per shot to cover costs, which we zeroed the day before. One experienced shooting coach per lane to guide them through and adjust scopes where needed. And let them have at it.
4 of the hunters have already signed up to shoot competition and a few more are keen.

We are looking at installing a 100m mound to accommodate load dev/zeroing in the near future, funds permitting.

It’s all about accommodating shooters from all backgrounds and making it work. A little thinking goes a long long way.
Josh Weaire
Blade
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2023 12:13 pm
Been thanked: 15 times

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by Blade »

It's fairly simple...

Sporter/Hunter should have 2 "sub classes"

Class 1 - Standard/off the shelf/Off the shelf parts build rifle...
- As purchased by "hunters".. Any scope can be used, Factory Ammo is required (no hand load)..

It doesn't matter if you've bought a RPR 300PRC or built a Howa 1500 223 in an oryx chassis.. Anyone can purchase the same rifle from any reputable store. Factory Ammo leans towards a more "level playing field".. You want to attempt 900yds with a 223? Go for it, (probably will need a kestrel :D ).
Class 1 is an intro class.. It's a fun, shoot what you bring and becomes more a "bragging rights" between mates. More importantly, this gives clubs the chance to gain new members who aren't intimidated by having to shoot against guys talking about hand loads etc.. They won't be under the impression that they need new tech and $1k worth of loading equipment to turn up... It gives them the "option" to upgrade later on but more importantly makes the sport achievable.
Competition for this could be based on points scored between 200-500yds (maybe bonus points on the longer stuff), but keeping the focus on "hunting distance" (if you can call it that).
Realistically, these guys will be happy just to see hits on targets... and would probably be pumped if they get a stubby holder for winning..

Class 2 - Modified hunting/off the shelf rifles/custom builds... Custom barrels etc.. Hand Loading is allowed... This is the class for the "sporters".. Build what you like (within reason) -
Class 2 is for those who are upgrading rifles, handloading and chasing the super centre.. They can throw around the cash etc and compare "rifle sizes"...
This is the class for (Gone in 60 seconds quote) "self-Indulgent wieners in this city with too much bloody money! " (sorry, couldn't help myself)

By keeping it simple, it will make life easier for those looking to start participating. You could even run class 1 as "hunter" and class 2 as "sporter"..
Why are you reading this? My post has concluded....
macguru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by macguru »

does anyone know when any clearer set of rules will be released ? I would like to buy another scope but first I would like to know what is happening...
id quod est
Weairy
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 1:43 pm
Location: Seymour, Vic
Has thanked: 74 times
Been thanked: 210 times

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by Weairy »

macguru wrote:does anyone know when any clearer set of rules will be released ? I would like to buy another scope but first I would like to know what is happening...


Rumoured to be a new set of rules in the next SSR updates, which I thought was actually due 30/06/23. Would love it if the NRAA would give some timelines to this stuff publicly….
Josh Weaire
Lithgow
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 8:07 pm
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by Lithgow »

macguru wrote:does anyone know when any clearer set of rules will be released ? I would like to buy another scope but first I would like to know what is happening...


25x would be a good bet and I reckon this week.
Steve G
Nowra Rifle Club NSW
Weairy
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 1:43 pm
Location: Seymour, Vic
Has thanked: 74 times
Been thanked: 210 times

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by Weairy »

LA105 wrote:
macguru wrote:does anyone know when any clearer set of rules will be released ? I would like to buy another scope but first I would like to know what is happening...


25x would be a good bet and I reckon this week.


I think 32x was the proposed change to power, but that was a while back, it might have all been flipped on its head. Hopefully 32x, otherwise I’m on the hunt for yet another scope
Josh Weaire
Amac
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:50 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: SH Rule development (read the first post before commenting)

Post by Amac »

Weairy wrote:
macguru wrote:does anyone know when any clearer set of rules will be released ? I would like to buy another scope but first I would like to know what is happening...


Rumoured to be a new set of rules in the next SSR updates, which I thought was actually due 30/06/23. Would love it if the NRAA would give some timelines to this stuff publicly….


New rules to be posted this week.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic