Matt .. i know and thats wrong. A rule written by those who dont know what they are on about???
Soild material .. No Way .. well it will be ok as long as that piece of ply is not bolted to the underside of the forend when not in use ..
FS of course
I have a 30mm flat bag aslo .. dont like it much, i prefer a cut down garden kneeling pad (20mm hard foam) $2.50 each
Sandbags
Moderator: Mod
-
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:04 pm
- Location: Adelaide (MBRC)
Matt ... I was not starting anything, i was being silly.
Also, i have to say that the SSR's say 2 sandbags. To me a sand bag is a sand bag, we all know what one looks like in the stores.
They do not contain bonded timber blocks to the base of them. So, mate, i must dissagre as i read the SSR's with solid clarity in regard to what a sand bag is.
If you look at what the stores have in STOCK you will see there are thin ones, fat ones and even STOCKy ones ... but alas, no wooden blocks.
I dont mean to take STOCK on this issue .. but as stated .. the rule is clear to me.
I do agree it needs to be changed to allow other types of packing material under the main bag
Also, i have to say that the SSR's say 2 sandbags. To me a sand bag is a sand bag, we all know what one looks like in the stores.
They do not contain bonded timber blocks to the base of them. So, mate, i must dissagre as i read the SSR's with solid clarity in regard to what a sand bag is.
If you look at what the stores have in STOCK you will see there are thin ones, fat ones and even STOCKy ones ... but alas, no wooden blocks.
I dont mean to take STOCK on this issue .. but as stated .. the rule is clear to me.
I do agree it needs to be changed to allow other types of packing material under the main bag
MBRC F-Class standard ... and proud of it!
Return to “Equipment & Technical”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Caska and 49 guests