80.5gn FB Berger seating depth???

Get or give advice on equipment, reloading and other technical issues.

Moderator: Mod

DenisA
Posts: 1542
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:00 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
Has thanked: 166 times
Been thanked: 137 times

80.5gn FB Berger seating depth???

Post by DenisA »

G’day All,
I’m about to do initial load tests on a new .223rem using 80.5gn FB bullets. 30” straight profile, 1:7T throated looooong. I expect to find a load around 25gn ar2208.
I’d love to get a general idea of what seating depth everyone is running these bullets at. I have a lot of experience with 155.5 FB in .308 which love to be run at .010” jump in many and varied combinations. Therefore I plan to run my powder charge tests on this .223 at .010” jump unless the general concensus suggests something else. I’d really appreciate your help. Thanks, Denis.
Barossa_222
Posts: 417
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 6:58 pm
Location: Barossa Valley
Has thanked: 188 times
Been thanked: 176 times

Re: 80.5gn FB Berger seating depth???

Post by Barossa_222 »

I was always told to start my testing jammed.
DenisA
Posts: 1542
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:00 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
Has thanked: 166 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: 80.5gn FB Berger seating depth???

Post by DenisA »

Barossa_222 wrote:I was always told to start my testing jammed.


This is true when fireforming
KHGS
Posts: 950
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 12:46 am
Location: Cowra NSW
Has thanked: 776 times
Been thanked: 537 times

Re: 80.5gn FB Berger seating depth???

Post by KHGS »

DenisA wrote:
Barossa_222 wrote:I was always told to start my testing jammed.


This is true when fireforming


Seating depth is always barrel related. I start with .015" jam, develop the most accurate powder charge with the bullet jammed then fine tune the seating depth. Doing it this way there is only one direction to tune seating depth. A little trivia for you, I shoot all target loads jammed and all of my bullets are mollied.
Keith H.
DenisA
Posts: 1542
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:00 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
Has thanked: 166 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: 80.5gn FB Berger seating depth???

Post by DenisA »

KHGS wrote:
DenisA wrote:
Barossa_222 wrote:I was always told to start my testing jammed.


This is true when fireforming


Seating depth is always barrel related. I start with .015" jam, develop the most accurate powder charge with the bullet jammed then fine tune the seating depth. Doing it this way there is only one direction to tune seating depth. A little trivia for you, I shoot all target loads jammed and all of my bullets are mollied.
Keith H.


I use to shoot them all jammed because I believe in the the theory of it. The way I shoot now is that I often unchamber rounds while waiting for conditions. Don’t want them getting hot. With a jammed load and secant bullet it’s no problems, never had an issue with VLDs but with some of the tangent bullet and hybrid types I’ve had bullets stay in the lands. So my theory now is jumped loads for tangent type bullets, especially with light neck tensions that I use.

I like your point about only having one way to go when you start jammed.
Peterla
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:49 am
Location: Barossa Sth Australia
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 46 times

Re: 80.5gn FB Berger seating depth???

Post by Peterla »

I do it slightly different.
I load 2 ladder tests 1 jammed 10 th and 1 jmped 10 th
Then shoot these at 1000 yards as ususal watching for pressure and hard bolt lift.

I can then see quite easy what the barrel likes. I have 2 SAUMs that love jump and 2 that love Jam all with 180 hybrids

Just what I do that seems to work for me.
Southern700
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:24 pm
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: 80.5gn FB Berger seating depth???

Post by Southern700 »

I'll have to check, but I'm pretty sure I jump around 0.024" (been a while since I checked erosion) - my chambers are a bit long for jamming with adequate seating depth. I will say though, 108s (6BRX) & 155.5 (308) seem to like a 4-10 thou jam. I've always stayed away from the dreaded "touching the lands" CBTO length...
Jason72
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:23 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: 80.5gn FB Berger seating depth???

Post by Jason72 »

Hi Denis,

From my experience which is limited compared to many, every barrel/rifle will respond differently when it comes to determining the best jump/jam (lots of resasons for this starting with the gunsmithing, casing type, right through to the type of material used to manufacture the barrel) so the best way is to take the time and try a few different set ups with the same powder load at the same time under the same conditions on your set up.

I have found that you can find out the best grouping at a shorter distance (this is subjective, some say 100m, some say 140m after the projectile stabilises etc) however the point is, for checking what jump/jam gives you the best grouping, a longer distance has more variables such as wind, mirage and most importantly the nut behind the butt. If you can reduce the variable you will get better data.

Just on jump verse jam, I have found that if you run a light neck tension such as 1 or 2 thou you cannot have jam. The reason for this is no matter how far you leave the projectile out of the casing, as soon as you close the bolt the projectile will move back the the maximum OAL no matter the jump, the casing is the weakest point rather than the hardened steel of a barrel so it will move back into the casing.
Try it, measure the OAL of a long load, load the rifle and close the bolt then remove the load and measure it again.

Hope this helps somewhat.
Cheers
Jason
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic