Grains or grams?

Get or give advice on equipment, reloading and other technical issues.

Moderator: Mod

Message
Author
Tim N
Posts: 918
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:18 pm
Location: Branxton NSW

Grains or grams?

#1 Postby Tim N » Mon Oct 08, 2018 12:36 pm

What do you use?
Someone stated they use grams not grains as they loose resolution.
1gn = 0.064g
You might get 1 more decimal place with grams but is there much difference?
My small brain prefers grains as that's what most of us talk in.
We don't rise to the level of our expectations, we fall to the level of our training. Archilochos 680-645 BC

RAVEN
Posts: 1921
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Adelaide South Australia (CTV)
Contact:

Re: Grains or grams?

#2 Postby RAVEN » Mon Oct 08, 2018 3:36 pm

Hi Tim (champ)
I'm no expert but one would think if a grain weight was selected and lost resolution why wouldn't it do the same with grams?
what you’re looking for is repeatability
weight measuring precision isn't important as SD of measurement.
RB :)

BRETT B
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 2:37 pm
Location: PERTH

Re: Grains or grams?

#3 Postby BRETT B » Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:39 pm

Hey Tim , The A&D will weigh to .02 of a grain which is 1 kernal of 2209 !! enough said !!
BRETT BUNYAN F CLASS OPEN SHOOTER W.A.

BATattack
Posts: 965
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:29 pm

Re: Grains or grams?

#4 Postby BATattack » Mon Oct 08, 2018 6:03 pm

From whay ive seen 1 kernal of 2209 is worth about 1fps in a SAUM. Is it worth trying to weigh to a fraction of a fps?

Tim N
Posts: 918
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:18 pm
Location: Branxton NSW

Re: Grains or grams?

#5 Postby Tim N » Mon Oct 08, 2018 8:09 pm

I’m more than happy with using grains as the measure, as you say the A&Ds are accurate to the kernel!
Which is probably more accurate than needed

my question was more for the benefit of someone who may think there’s more accuracy in grams to 3 decimal points rather than grains to 2 decimal points.
We don't rise to the level of our expectations, we fall to the level of our training. Archilochos 680-645 BC

Steve N
Posts: 396
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 8:16 pm
Location: Gippsland Victoria.

Re: Grains or grams?

#6 Postby Steve N » Tue Oct 09, 2018 8:39 am

I reckon keep it simple when weighing powder and stick to grains even if to just prevent mistakes. I'd rather rely on my scales than my maths.

Brad Y
Posts: 2021
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:21 pm

Re: Grains or grams?

#7 Postby Brad Y » Tue Oct 09, 2018 6:40 pm

If you told them to use kilograms then they will be working with more decimals

bsouthernau
Posts: 617
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 4:31 pm

Re: Grains or grams?

#8 Postby bsouthernau » Sat Oct 13, 2018 8:56 am

Tim N wrote:I’m more than happy with using grains as the measure, as you say the A&Ds are accurate to the kernel!
Which is probably more accurate than needed

my question was more for the benefit of someone who may think there’s more accuracy in grams to 3 decimal points rather than grains to 2 decimal points.


My observation is that a granule of 2209 averages out at a bit more than .02gr so it's not only more accurate than NEEDED, it's got more accuracy than you can USE.

As for your original Dorothy Dix question - what's in a name? Whether you call it 1mg or .02gr it's still the same amount of stuff.

basil
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2016 9:33 pm

Re: Grains or grams?

#9 Postby basil » Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:26 pm

Resolution, nothing to do with decimal places.


Return to “Equipment & Technical”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests