Which F Class Stock Design

Suppliers - have a new product or service to announce? Shooters - have a question or suggestion for a Supplier?

Moderator: Mod

Message
Author
bobeager
Posts: 411
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:29 pm
Location: Goulburn NSW Australia

Which F Class Stock Design

#1 Postby bobeager » Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:17 pm

I make the odd Timber F Class stock, and I have some spare bits and pieces on hand and propose to make one "spec build". It will be made from AA Grade bonded marine ply, for a RH Barnard model P and will have a Vee Block bedding.
Question 1, which would be more popular...a "low boy" 3 inch forend stock for F Open, or a F Std / F/TR style to be used with a BiPod?
Question2, which is more popular, a thumbhole or conventional grip?

Sort of interested in what people are using these days.

Razer
Posts: 530
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 8:44 pm
Location: Orange,N.S.W.

#2 Postby Razer » Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:52 pm

I'll probably get shot down for this, but personally the thumbhole stock, to me, is a step backwards for comfortable positioning and trigger control.
Just my 2 cents worth.

Sambo
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:21 am

#3 Postby Sambo » Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:05 pm

I've started seeing people remove the pistol grip altogether and just "pinch" the trigger and trigger guard. It makes sense to me to have no contact on the stock (cheek, hand, shoulder), but what would I know, I shoot TR :-s

jcinsa
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:59 pm
Location: Adelaide Hills

#4 Postby jcinsa » Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:19 pm

For me Bob,

I would go with a low boy 3 " forend stock with a conventional grip,

and use it for F Standard.

My feelings at the moment.

John
Argue with a fool, and all the casual observer will see is two fools arguing.

RAVEN
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Adelaide South Australia (CTV)

#5 Postby RAVEN » Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:51 pm

Bob if you can make and F/TR stock that is light and with stiff fore-end I know there would be demand for that.
most stocks available are 1.5KG plus so something that is lighter the build could put more into the barrel.
RB

bobeager
Posts: 411
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:29 pm
Location: Goulburn NSW Australia

#6 Postby bobeager » Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:34 am

Thanks for the feedback so far. I have managed to make a stock that came in at 1 Kg. but I had to use carbon fibre down the barrel channel to make it stiff enough. Also used Al pillars in lieu of a vee block to save weight.

RAVEN
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Adelaide South Australia (CTV)

#7 Postby RAVEN » Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:29 am

Bob you have a very marketable product there
take some pic and put it into the suppliers section.
Cheers
RB


Return to “Supplier News and Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests