Use of non approved projectiles to win Queen's.

If you shoot full-bore, then you're welcome to use this forum to discuss your sport.

Moderator: Mod

Message
Author
Wakey7
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 9:18 pm

Use of non approved projectiles to win Queen's.

#1 Postby Wakey7 » Thu Jun 21, 2012 8:55 pm

During the 2010 matches in Brisbane, Australia, Bryan became the first American to win the prestigious Queen's Prize Match. Going in to the last day of the match, Bryan was in 60th place (out of 185 shooters). "The 900 and 1000 yard
strings were fired on the last day and the wind was heavy frorn the left. Using the Berger 155.5 grain FULLBORE bullets, I was able to make up the 60 places and win the toumament by a single V-bull. Being the first American to win the Queen's Prize was the experience of a lifetime and a tremendous honor"

Bryan shot a .308 Palma Rilfe, built on a Barnard action, Mastin offset stock, Warner rear sight, and Stallings front sight. He shot Applied Ballistics FULLBORE ammunition, which uses Berger 30 cal 155.5 gr Fullbore bullets and Lapua cases.

Just found this on Berger Bullets website. Correct me if I am wrong but 155.5 grain Berger's are NOT yet approved projectiles. Maybe this is worth NRAA investigation ???

johnk
Posts: 2211
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:55 pm
Location: Brisbane

#2 Postby johnk » Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:29 pm

I seem to recall that the 2010 & 2011 Queens were contested according to ICFRA equipment rules in deference to those championships being hosted here in 2011. Might be worthwhile checking that out too.

Southcape
Posts: 707
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 7:57 pm
Location: Western Australia

#3 Postby Southcape » Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:08 pm

John is correct. Because the world championships were on, the NRAA used ICFRA rules. Otherwise there would have been an awlful lot of upset International shooters.
Last edited by Southcape on Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Linda

Wakey7
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 9:18 pm

#4 Postby Wakey7 » Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:46 pm

Thanks for clearing that up guy's. Was fairly sure that a top line shooter like Bryan would not be breaking the rules.

macguru
Posts: 1627
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am

#5 Postby macguru » Wed Aug 29, 2012 6:38 pm

All this confusion is why so many are moving to F Open.....

Or just using whatever they want .........

Anyways F Open is better for me ... I need a bigger BC because my wind reading skills are crap ;)


:)

RAVEN
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Adelaide South Australia (CTV)

#6 Postby RAVEN » Wed Aug 29, 2012 8:22 pm

macguru it all relative :idea:

macguru
Posts: 1627
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:49 am

#7 Postby macguru » Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:25 pm

If you mean what I think you mean, that when everybody has 7mm 180 bergers then you have to read the wind right to keep up your X count then I get it.... but I am trying to delude myself :)

RAVEN
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Adelaide South Australia (CTV)

#8 Postby RAVEN » Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:49 pm

macguru I'm a bit that way myself (deluded) 8)

Wakey7
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 9:18 pm

#9 Postby Wakey7 » Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:24 pm

You guy's could always come and shoot T/R. Just for the fun of it.

RAVEN
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Adelaide South Australia (CTV)

#10 Postby RAVEN » Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:57 pm

we do already once a year we swap and have TR + F Class team match great fun but it takes my elbows 3 months to recover :lol: :lol:

Seddo
Posts: 555
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 5:56 pm
Location: Latrobe Valley

#11 Postby Seddo » Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:14 am

Wakey7 wrote:You guy's could always come and shoot T/R. Just for the fun of it.


i pull out the 303 once a year and that is enough peep sights for me.
----------------------
Seddo

Moe City Rifle Club


Return to “Full-bore/Target Rifle”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests